"Good Lord, no!" I cried. "Why should I?"
"You"re on the staff," said Ian.
"Look here," I said impatiently, "I hereby authorise the crowd of you to call me any name you like."
The cla.s.s became indignant.
"You can"t criticise the staff," said one.
"Why not?" I asked, and they looked at each other in alarm. This was carrying self-government too far.
Suddenly Mary jumped up.
"Then if we can criticise the staff here goes! I accuse Miss Brown of favouritism."
It was a bombsh.e.l.l. Everyone jumped up, and some cried: "Shame!
Withdraw!" The chairman appealed to me.
"I have nothing to do with it," I protested.
Then bitter words flew. They told me that I, as a member of the staff, should squash Mary. Voices became louder, but then the bell rang and the cla.s.s had to go to its own cla.s.s-room to work.
My colleagues when they heard the story agreed with the children; they held that I acted wrongly in listening to an accusation against a colleague. My argument was that I was a guest at a meeting; I had no vote, nor would I have interfered had I been a member of the meeting.
I was quite sure that if the bell had not broken up the meeting somebody would have made the discovery that Miss Brown was the proper person to make the accusation to. When they thought that Mary insulted me they sent for me, and I fully expected they would send for Miss Brown. Again I argued that if Miss Brown had favourites the cla.s.s had a right to criticise her. If she had no favourites let her arraign the cla.s.s before a meeting of the whole school and accuse them of libel.
Looking back I still think my att.i.tude was right, for unless the staff can lay aside all dignity and become members of the gang education is not free. Yet I see now that I was secretly exulting in the discomfiture of a colleague . . . a common human failing which none of us care to recognise in ourselves. It is a sad fact but a true one that however much Dr. A. protests when a patient tells him that Dr. B.
is a clumsy fool, unconsciously at least Dr. A. is gratified at the criticism of his rival. Psycho-a.n.a.lysts, that is people who are supposed to know the contents of their unconscious, are just as guilty in this respect as other doctors, and if anyone doubts this let him ask a Freudian what he thinks of the Jungian in the next street.
My earliest memory of professional jealousy goes back to the age of seven. I lived next door to a dentist, a real qualified L.D.S. Across the street lived a quack dental surgeon. When trade was dull these two used to come to their respective doors and converse with each other in the good old simple way of putting the fingers to the nose. They never spoke to each other. Life in a northern town was simple in these days.
Helen Macdonald is four years old, and her mother and I have some breezy discussions about her upbringing. Mrs. Mac has a great admiration for her own mother, and she is bent on bringing up her daughter in the way that she was brought up.
"Mother made me obey and I"ll make Helen obey," she said to-day with decision.
"It"s dangerous," I said.
"No it isn"t; it worked well enough in my case anyway."
"Don"t blow your own trumpet, madam!"
She smiled.
"I don"t think I am a bad product of the good old way," she said with a self-satisfied air.
"Madam, shall I tell you the truth about yourself?"
She bubbled and drew her chair closer to mine.
"Do!" she cried, and then added: "But I won"t believe the nasty bits."
Mac chuckled.
"To begin with," I said pompously, "you are an awful example of a bad education."
She bowed mockingly and Mac guffawed. He is a wee bit afraid of his wife and he marvels at my courage in ragging her.
"You," I continued, "were made to obey as a child, and as a result you became dependent on your mother. In short you are your own mother."
"Don"t be silly," she said with a frown; "I want your serious opinion."
"And you are getting it," I replied. "Because you had to obey you never lived your own life, and naturally you never had a mind of your own. To this day you act as your mother acted. She made her daughter obey; you follow her example; she made scones in such and such a way; you make scones in exactly the same way."
"That"s right!" laughed Mac.
Mrs. Mac looked thoughtful.
"Anyway," she said quickly, "they are excellent scones."
"Most excellent scones," I hastened to add, "but my point is that if we all follow our parents there will be no progress."
"Progress will never bring better scones," said Mac and he patted his wife"s cheek.
"Mac," I said gallantly, "your wife has brought scones to their perfect and utmost evolution. She has made the super-scone. Only, Helen isn"t a scone you know."
At this point Helen was found trying to pull the marble clock down from the mantlepiece. Her mother rescued the clock as it was falling, and she scolded the fair Helen.
"You are all theory," she cried to me. "What would you do in a case like this?"
"Same as you did," I answered hastily, and then added: "Only I would try to give her so many interesting things to play with that she"d forget to want the clock."
Then Mrs. Mac indignantly dragged out Helen"s toys from a cupboard.
"Dozens of them!" she cried, "and she is tired of every one."
Then I discoursed on toys. The toys of the world are nearly all bad.
Helen has a beautiful sleeping doll that cost five pounds; rather I should say that Helen _had_ a beautiful sleeping doll that cost five pounds. On the one occasion that Helen was allowed to play with it she made a careful attempt to open the head with a pair of scissors to see what made the eyes close and open. Then her mother put the doll in a box, packed the box in a trunk, and explained to Helen that the doll was to lie in that trunk until Helen had a little baby girl of her own.
I explained to Mrs. Mac that the toy a child needs is one that will take to pieces. Every toy should be a mine of discovery. The only good toys that I know of are Meccano and Primus, but there is much need for constructive toys for younger children.
"Mac," I said, "if you were even a pa.s.sably good husband you would be making Montessori apparatus for your offspring."
We have many arguments like this. Mrs. Mac"s problem is that of a million mothers; she has to fit the child into an adult environment.
Yesterday she was painting in oils. The baker whistled outside and she ran out to get the bread. On her return she found that Helen was busily painting the pink wall-paper a prussian blue.
Wealthy mothers solve the problem by employing nurses, but the solution is a poor one. Few nurses know enough about children, and many do positive harm by frightening the child. Nor can the hired nurse give the infinite amount of love that a child demands. If she could it is probable that she would be sacked, for no mother likes to see her child lavish his love on another. On more than one occasion I have discovered that the parents of children who loved me were hostile to me. That is natural. If a father is continually hearing his daughter say: "Mr. Neill says this; Mr. Neill says that," I have every sympathy with him when he growls: "d.a.m.n this Neill blighter!" On the other hand I have no sympathy with him if he expects me to ask his little Ada how her dear charming papa is.