5. It is a comfort to us at present 55.
B. G.o.d"S COVENANT WITH NOAH.
Vs. 8-11. _And G.o.d spake unto Noah, and his sons with him, saying, And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you; of all that go out of the ark, even every beast of the earth. And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of the flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth._
47. Previously we at various times explained this ma.s.sing of words.
When the Holy Spirit is prolix, there is a cause for it. Let us therefore, consider what fear, dread and peril Noah and his family endured and it will be easily understood why it was necessary for G.o.d to say and to emphasize the same things with such frequency.
48. When, in addition it is remembered that the covenant here spoken of does not pertain to man alone but embraces every living soul, we recognize that the promise does not relate to the seed but merely, to this bodily life, enjoyed by man in common with the beasts; this G.o.d will not destroy by another flood.
Vs. 12-16. _And G.o.d said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for the perpetual generations: I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pa.s.s, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud, and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between G.o.d and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth._
49. The term "perpetual generations" deserves particular notice; it embraces not only man and beast at that time, but all their offspring down to the end of the world. We learn another thing from this pa.s.sage. G.o.d usually confirms his promise with an outward sign. In the third chapter above we read of the coats of skin with which he covered the nakedness of the first parents as token of his protection and guardianship.
50. Some offer the following apt allegorical explanation. As the skin of the dead sheep keeps warm our body, so Christ, having died, keeps us warm by his Spirit, and will, on the last day, raise us up and give us life. Others say that the skins were selected as a sign of mortality. But this seems unnecessary; all our life reminds us of mortality. More expedient was a token of life, suggesting the blessing and favor of G.o.d. The office of such tokens is to console, not to terrify. So was the sign of the rainbow given, a supplement of the promise.
51. In chapter 8, 21-22, G.o.d says in his heart that he repents of that terrible punishment, and promises that he will not repeat it, because the imagination of man"s heart is evil from his youth. If he should desire to so punish evil, there would be need of a flood every day.
Here he again sends forth his Word to mankind, through an angel, or possibly through the mouth of Noah, promising that no flood shall hereafter come upon the earth. That the promise is repeated so often is evidence of G.o.d"s endeavor, in loving kindness, to remove man"s fear of punishment and to set before him a hope of blessing and utmost mercy.
52. Such consolation Noah and his loved ones required. One who has been humbled by G.o.d cannot forget the wound and the pain. Chastening is longer remembered than blessing. Boys are a case in point. The tender mother, having chastised her child with the rod, endeavors to calm him with toys and other allurements, yet the memory of pain lingers, and the child cannot restrain frequent sighs and bitter sobs.
How much more difficult for the conscience to accept solace after having felt the wrath of G.o.d and the fear of death! So firmly fixed are these in the mind that the soul trembles and fears in spite of gifts and consolations offered.
53. So G.o.d here shows his good will in manifold ways and feels singular joy in pouring forth mercy. He is like a mother who pets and caresses her boy until he at last begins to forget his tears and to smile into his mother"s face.
54. Hence figures are employed, and words are ma.s.sed and the subject is presented in a clearer and clearer light, in order to adapt the consolation to the needs of the wretched people who, for an entire year, had been witnesses of the immeasurable wrath of G.o.d. They could not be delivered from fear and terror by an occasional word. There was need of repeating the promise with much exposition to dry their tears and to soften their grief. For, though they were saints, they were flesh, even as we are.
55. Likewise we in our day need this consolation. At all times when the elements rage, we may be secure in the thought that the fountains of heaven and the wells of the deep are closed up by the word of G.o.d.
The rainbow shows itself to this day for the purpose of symbolizing that, henceforth, there shall never be another general flood. And this promise requires, on our part, the faith that we trust G.o.d, in his mercy, will never bring another great flood upon us.
C. THE RAINBOW.
1. Can it be a.s.signed to natural causes 56-58.
* What to think of the fiery meteors 59-60.
2. Can it be caused by the position of the clouds 60.
3. The rainbow witnesses of G.o.d"s wrath and of his goodness 61.
4. Did it exist before the flood?
a. Opinion of those believing it did, and their reasons 62.
b. Luther"s opinion that it was a new creation 63.
c. Solomon"s words, "There is nothing new", do not apply here 64.
5. Rainbow to be viewed as a new creature and as G.o.d"s sign-board 65.
6. Colors of the rainbow.
a. What are they and their number 66.
b. What do they signify 67.
7. To what end should the rainbow serve us 68.
C. THE RAINBOW.
56. They further dispute whether the natural causes in the rainbow signify this. It is well known that philosophers, especially Aristotle in his book on Meteors, use all sorts of arguments on the color of the rainbow, on the character of the clouds where it is produced, and on its curvature. Quite appropriately the resemblance is noted between a mirror, which reflects an image, and the moist and arched cloud, which catches the rays of the sun, and by reflection produces the rainbow.
Reason sees in such phenomena what appears to it most probable, but it does not discover the truth everywhere. That is not in the power of the creature but of the Creator alone. As for me, I have never given to any book less credence than to that on meteors, the basic principle of which is the a.s.sumption that natural causes explain everything.
57. Some declare the rainbow to be a forerunner of a storm lasting three days, which I am ready to admit, but this much is certain, that it signifies that there will never be another flood. However, it derives this signification, not from any natural causes but only from the Word of G.o.d. Its meaning is such, only because G.o.d orders and declares it to be so through his Word. Circ.u.mcision was a token that the seed of Abraham were the people of G.o.d; yet circ.u.mcision did not have this meaning in itself, but only through the Word which was joined with it. Again, the clothing of skin signified life and safety, not because they contained this guarantee by nature, but because G.o.d had promised it. So, the significance of the rainbow that the flood shall not return, is not based upon the Word of G.o.d.
58. I do not altogether ignore theories along the lines of natural law concerning these matters; but since they are not substantiated, I place little trust in them. The reasoning of Aristotle regarding the humid and hollow cloud as the cause of the rainbow is not reliable, such clouds may exist without producing a rainbow. Again, according to the greater or lesser density of the medium, the bow may appear wider or narrower. I have seen here at Wittenberg a circular rainbow, forming a complete ring, not simply an arch terminating on the surface of the earth, as rainbows generally appear. Why, then, do rainbows a.s.sume different forms at different times? A philosopher, I suppose, will think of some reason; for he will consider it a disgrace not to be able to a.s.sign a reason for all things. But indeed, he will never persuade me to believe that he speaks the truth.
59. The only consistent and incontrovertable view to take is that all these phenomena are either works of G.o.d or of evil spirits. I have no doubt that the dancing goats (stars), the flying serpents, fiery lances, and the like, are produced by evil spirits, which thus gambol in the air, either to terrify or to deceive men. The flames which appear on board of ships were thought by the heathen to be Castor and Pollux. Sometimes the image of a moon appears above the ears of horses. It is certain that all these things are due to the antics of evil spirits in the air, though Aristotle believes them to be luminous air, just as he also declares that a comet is shining vapor.
60. To me it appears that we shall move with greater security and certainty, when, arguing from cause to effect, we conclude that the comet blazes, when it pleases G.o.d, as a sign of calamity, just as the rainbow glows, when it pleases G.o.d as a sign of mercy. Who can compute all the causes which produce the appearance of the rainbow in such diversity of beautiful color, and in the form of an arch of perfect curvature? The arrangement of the clouds alone surely does not produce this perfection. Hence it is by the will and the promise of G.o.d, and fulfilling his pleasure, that the rainbow is a sign to man and beast that there will nevermore at any time be a flood.
61. In recognition of this token we ought to give thanks to G.o.d. As often as the rainbow appears, it proclaims to the world with a loud voice, as it were, the story of the wrath of G.o.d, which once destroyed the world by a flood. And it proclaims solace for us, so that we may conclude that G.o.d is propitious to us henceforth and will never again visit upon us so fearful a punishment. It teaches both the love and the fear of G.o.d, the highest virtues, of which philosophy knows nothing. Philosophy only disputes about material and formal causes. It does not know the final cause of this most beautiful creation. But theology does explain it.
62. In this connection also the question has received much attention whether the rainbow existed from the beginning. And in this controversy much force has been displayed. Since it is written above (ch 2, 23) that G.o.d created heaven and earth in six days, and then rested from all his works, some conclude that the rainbow existed from the beginning. Otherwise it would follow that creation extended beyond those six days. What, however, occurred in Noah"s time is this, that the rainbow, created in the beginning, was selected by G.o.d and made, through a new word, a fixed symbol, having existed hitherto without special significance. To support this view, they even quote the word of Solomon that "there is no new thing under the sun," Ec 1, 9. On this they base their argument that after those six days no new thing has been created.
63. My opinion is quite the contrary--that the rainbow never had existed before; it was then and there created. Thus, the coats of skin with which G.o.d clothed the first parents certainly were not created in those six days, but after man"s fall; hence, they were a new creation.
The statement that G.o.d rested, must not be interpreted to mean that he created nothing thereafter; for Christ says, "My Father worketh even until now, and I work," Jn 5, 17.
64. Solomon"s statement that there is no new thing under the sun, has given much trouble to the learned. But is it not apparent that it refers not to the works of G.o.d, but to original sin, meaning that the same reasoning powers Adam had after the fall are found in man today--the same debates concerning morals, vices, virtues, the nurture of the body and the transaction of business? As the comic poet has it, speaking of another matter, "Nothing is said that has not been said before." Really, within the sphere of man"s activity and effort there is nothing new; the same words, thoughts, designs, the same emotions, griefs, affections and incidents exist now which always existed.
Consequently it is quite inappropriate, in consequence to apply this aphorism to G.o.d and his works.
65. Therefore, I believe that the rainbow was a new creation, not seen in the world before that time. It was established to remind the world of the bygone wrath, traces of which are still seen in the rainbow, and to give a.s.surance of the mercy of G.o.d. It is a record, or picture in which both the bygone wrath and the present mercy are revealed.
66. There is also a difference of opinion as to the colors of the rainbow. Some say there are four colors: the fiery, the bright yellow, the green and the color of water, or blue. But I think there are only two, those of fire and water. The fiery color is above, unless the rainbow is seen reversed; then, as in a mirror, that which is above is seen below. Where the hues of fire and water meet, or blend, yellow results.
67. The colors have been thus arranged by G.o.d for a definite purpose.
The blue should be a reminder of bygone wrath; the fiery color, a picture to us of the future judgment. While the interior or blue portion is restricted, the outer and fiery color is without bounds.
Thus, the first world perished by the flood, but an end was set to G.o.d"s wrath. A remnant was preserved and a second world arose, but bounds are set to it. When G.o.d shall destroy the world by fire, this bodily life will never be restored. The wicked will suffer the everlasting punishment of death in the fire, while the saints will be raised up unto a new and everlasting life, which, though in the body, shall not be of the body, but of the spirit.
68. Let this sign teach us to fear G.o.d and to trust in him. So may we escape the punishment of fire, even as we have escaped the punishment of the flood. It will be more practical to think of these things than to consider those philosophical arguments concerning the material cause.
III. ALLEGORIES 69-132.
A. ALLEGORIES IN GENERAL 69-81.