The whole tone of this letter shows not only that Lady Byron never lost her deep interest in her husband, but that it was by this experience that all her religious ideas were modified. There is another of these letters in which she thus speaks of her husband"s writings and character:--

"The author of the article on "Goethe" appears to me to have the mind which could dispel the illusion about another poet, without depreciating his claims . . . to the truest inspiration.

"Who has sought to distinguish between the holy and the unholy in that spirit? to prove, by the very degradation of the one, how high the other was. A character is never done justice to by extenuating its faults: so I do not agree to nisi bonum. It is kinder to read the blotted page."

These letters show that Lady Byron"s idea was that, even were the whole mournful truth about Lord Byron fully told, there was still a foundation left for pity and mercy. She seems to have remembered, that if his sins were peculiar, so also were his temptations; and to have schooled herself for years to gather up, and set in order in her memory, all that yet remained precious in this great ruin. Probably no English writer that ever has made the attempt could have done this more perfectly. Though Lady Byron was not a poet par excellence, yet she belonged to an order of souls fully equal to Lord Byron. Hers was more the a.n.a.lytical mind of the philosopher than the creative mind of the poet; and it was, for that reason, the one mind in our day capable of estimating him fully both with justice and mercy. No person in England had a more intense sensibility to genius, in its loftier acceptation, than Lady Byron; and none more completely sympathised with what was pure and exalted in her husband"s writings.

There is this peculiarity in Lord Byron, that the pure and the impure in his poetry often run side by side without mixing,--as one may see at Geneva the muddy stream of the Arve and the blue waters of the Rhone flowing together unmingled. What, for example, can be n.o.bler, and in a higher and tenderer moral strain than his lines on the dying gladiator, in "Childe Harold"? What is more like the vigour of the old Hebrew Scriptures than his thunderstorm in the Alps? What can more perfectly express moral ideality of the highest kind than the exquisite descriptions of Aurora Raby,--pure and high in thought and language, occurring, as they do, in a work full of the most utter vileness?

Lady Byron"s hopes for her husband fastened themselves on all the n.o.ble fragments yet remaining in that shattered temple of his mind which lay blackened and thunder-riven; and she looked forward to a sphere beyond this earth, where infinite mercy should bring all again to symmetry and order. If the strict theologian must regret this as an undue lat.i.tude of charity, let it at least be remembered that it was a charity which sprang from a Christian virtue, and which she extended to every human being, however lost, however low. In her view, the mercy which took him was mercy that could restore all.

In my recollections of the interview with Lady Byron, when this whole history was presented, I can remember that it was with a softened and saddened feeling that I contemplated the story, as one looks on some awful, inexplicable ruin.

The last letter which I addressed to Lady Byron upon this subject will show that such was the impression of the whole interview. It was in reply to the one written on the death of my son:--

"Jan. 30, 1858.

"MY DEAR FRIEND,--I did long to hear from you at a time when few knew how to speak, because I knew that you had known everything that sorrow can teach,--you, whose whole life has been a crucifixion, a long ordeal.

"But I believe that the Lamb, who stands for ever "in the midst of the throne, as it had been slain," has everywhere His followers,--those who seem sent into the world, as He was, to suffer for the redemption of others; and, like Him, they must look to the joy set before them,--of redeeming others.

"I often think that G.o.d called you to this beautiful and terrible ministry when He suffered you to link your destiny with one so strangely gifted and so fearfully tempted. Perhaps the reward that is to meet you when you enter within the veil where you must so soon pa.s.s will be to see that spirit, once chained and defiled, set free and purified; and to know that to you it has been given, by your life of love and faith, to accomplish this glorious change.

"I think increasingly on the subject on which you conversed with me once,--the future state of retribution. It is evident to me that the spirit of Christianity has produced in the human spirit a tenderness of love which wholly revolts from the old doctrine on this subject; and I observe, that, the more Christ-like anyone becomes, the more difficult it seems for them to accept it as. .h.i.therto presented. And yet, on the contrary, it was Christ who said, "Fear Him that is able to destroy both soul and body in h.e.l.l;" and the most appalling language is that of Christ himself.

"Certain ideas, once prevalent, certainly must be thrown off. An endless infliction for past sins was once the doctrine: that we now generally reject. The doctrine now generally taught is, that an eternal persistence in evil necessitates everlasting suffering, since evil induces misery by the eternal nature of things; and this, I fear, is inferable from the a.n.a.logies of Nature, and confirmed by the whole implication of the Bible.

"What attention have you given to this subject? and is there any fair way of disposing of the current of a.s.sertion, and the still deeper under-current of implication, on this subject, without admitting one which loosens all faith in revelation, and throws us on pure naturalism? But of one thing I always feel sure: probation does not end with this present life; and the number of the saved may therefore be infinitely greater than the world"s history leads us to suppose.

"I think the Bible implies a great crisis, a struggle, an agony, in which G.o.d and Christ and all the good are engaged in redeeming from sin; and we are not to suppose that the little portion that is done for souls as they pa.s.s between the two doors of birth and death is all.

"The Bible is certainly silent there. The primitive Church believed in the mercies of an intermediate state; and it was only the abuse of it by Romanism that drove the Church into its present position, which, I think, is wholly indefensible, and wholly irreconcilable with the spirit of Christ. For if it were the case, that probation in all cases begins and ends here, G.o.d"s example would surely be one that could not be followed, and He would seem to be far less persevering than even human beings in efforts to save.

"Nothing is plainer than that it would be wrong to give up any mind to eternal sin till every possible thing had been done for its recovery; and that is so clearly not the case here, that I can see that, with thoughtful minds, this belief would cut the very roots of religious faith in G.o.d: for there is a difference between facts that we do not understand, and facts which we do understand, and perceive to be wholly irreconcilable with a certain character professed by G.o.d.

"If G.o.d says He is love, and certain ways of explaining Scripture make Him less loving and patient than man, then we make Scripture contradict itself. Now, as no pa.s.sage of Scripture limits probation to this life, and as one pa.s.sage in Peter certainly unequivocally a.s.serts that Christ preached to the spirits in prison while His body lay in the grave, I am clear upon this point.

"But it is also clear, that if there be those who persist in refusing G.o.d"s love, who choose to dash themselves for ever against the inflexible laws of the universe, such souls must for ever suffer.

"There may be souls who hate purity because it reveals their vileness; who refuse G.o.d"s love, and prefer eternal conflict with it. For such there can be no peace. Even in this life, we see those whom the purest self-devoting love only inflames to madness; and we have only to suppose an eternal persistence in this to suppose eternal misery.

"But on this subject we can only leave all reverently in the hands of that Being whose almighty power is "declared chiefly in showing mercy.""

CHAPTER VIII. CONCLUSION.

In leaving this subject, I have an appeal to make to the men, and more especially to the women, who have been my readers.

In justice to Lady Byron, it must be remembered that this publication of her story is not her act, but mine. I trust you have already conceded, that, in so severe and peculiar a trial, she had a right to be understood fully by her immediate circle of friends, and to seek of them counsel in view of the moral questions to which such very exceptional circ.u.mstances must have given rise. Her communication to me was not an address to the public: it was a statement of the case for advice. True, by leaving the whole, unguarded by pledge or promise, it left discretionary power with me to use it if needful.

You, my sisters, are to judge whether the accusation laid against Lady Byron by the "Blackwood," in 1869, was not of so barbarous a nature as to justify my producing the truth I held in my hands in reply.

The "Blackwood" claimed a right to re-open the subject because it was not a private but a public matter. It claimed that Lord Byron"s unfortunate marriage might have changed not only his own destiny, but that of all England. It suggested, that, but for this, instead of wearing out his life in vice, and corrupting society by impure poetry, he might, at this day, have been leading the counsels of the State, and helping the onward movements of the world. Then it directly charged Lady Byron with meanly forsaking her husband in a time of worldly misfortune; with fabricating a destructive accusation of crime against him, and confirming this accusation by years of persistent silence more guilty than open a.s.sertion.

It has been alleged, that, even admitting that Lady Byron"s story were true, it never ought to have been told. Is it true, then, that a woman has not the same right to individual justice that a man has? If the cases were reversed, would it have been thought just that Lord Byron should go down in history loaded with accusations of crime because he could be only vindicated by exposing the crime of his wife?

It has been said that the crime charged on Lady Byron was comparatively unimportant, and the one against Lord Byron was deadly.

But the "Blackwood," in opening the controversy, called Lady Byron by the name of an unnatural female criminal, whose singular atrocities alone ent.i.tle her to infamous notoriety; and the crime charged upon her was sufficient to warrant the comparison.

Both crimes are foul, unnatural, horrible; and there is no middle ground between the admission of the one or the other.

You must either conclude that a woman, all whose other works, words, and deeds were generous, just, and gentle, committed this one monstrous exceptional crime, without a motive, and against all the a.n.a.logies of her character, and all the a.n.a.logies of her treatment of others; or you must suppose that a man known by all testimony to have been boundlessly licentious, who took the very course which, by every physiological law, would have led to unnatural results, did, at last, commit an unnatural crime.

The question, whether I did right, when Lady Byron was thus held up as an abandoned criminal by the "Blackwood," to interpose my knowledge of the real truth in her defence, is a serious one; but it is one for which I must account to G.o.d alone, and in which, without any contempt of the opinions of my fellow-creatures, I must say, that it is a small thing to be judged of man"s judgment.

I had in the case a responsibility very different from that of many others. I had been consulted in relation to the publication of this story by Lady Byron, at a time when she had it in her power to have exhibited it with all its proofs, and commanded an instant conviction. I have reason to think that my advice had some weight in suppressing that disclosure. I gave that advice under the impression that the Byron controversy was a thing for ever pa.s.sed, and never likely to return.

It had never occurred to me, that, nine years after Lady Byron"s death, a standard English periodical would declare itself free to re-open this controversy, when all the generation who were her witnesses had pa.s.sed from earth; and that it would re-open it in the most savage form of accusation, and with the indors.e.m.e.nt and commendation of a book of the vilest slanders, edited by Lord Byron"s mistress.

Let the reader mark the retributions of justice. The accusations of the "Blackwood," in 1869, were simply an intensified form of those first concocted by Lord Byron in his "Clytemnestra" poem of 1816. He forged that weapon, and bequeathed it to his party. The "Blackwood" took it up, gave it a sharper edge, and drove it to the heart of Lady Byron"s fame.

The result has been the disclosure of this history. It is, then, Lord Byron himself, who, by his network of wiles, his ceaseless persecutions of his wife, his efforts to extend his partisanship beyond the grave, has brought on this tumultuous exposure. He, and he alone, is the cause of this revelation.

And now I have one word to say to those in England who, with all the facts and doc.u.ments in their hands which could at once have cleared Lady Byron"s fame, allowed the barbarous a.s.sault of the "Blackwood" to go over the civilised world without a reply. I speak to those who, knowing that I am speaking the truth, stand silent; to those who have now the ability to produce the facts and doc.u.ments by which this cause might be instantly settled, and who do not produce them.

I do not judge them; but I remind them that a day is coming when they and I must stand side by side at the great judgment-seat,--I to give an account for my speaking, they for their silence.

In that day, all earthly considerations will have vanished like morning mists, and truth or falsehood, justice or injustice, will be the only realities.

In that day, G.o.d, who will judge the secrets of all men, will judge between this man and this woman. Then, if never before, the full truth shall be told both of the depraved and dissolute man who made it his life"s object to defame the innocent, and the silent, the self-denying woman who made it her life"s object to give s.p.a.ce for repentance to the guilty.

PART III. MISCELLANEOUS DOc.u.mENTS.

THE TRUE STORY OF LADY BYRON"S LIFE, AS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN "THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY."

The reading world of America has lately been presented with a book which is said to sell rapidly, and which appears to meet with universal favour.

The subject of the book may be thus briefly stated: The mistress of Lord Byron comes before the world for the sake of vindicating his fame from slanders and aspersions cast on him by his wife. The story of the mistress versus wife may be summed up as follows:--